Lately there has been flares of questions that heat deep into my heart. Mostly those questions are of external factors, namely from the people around. But me being a good thermos is able repel such heating by choosing to deny certain things that ought to be faced with some level of seriousness.
Further more it is 2 thermos that are repelling flaring questions about "us". On my part this thermos is completely shut. Her part, she's got a good line of defence utilizing denial as a thick thermal barrage. The more intense the flames become, the more we take cover.
But there must come a time when one must start to open to allow a wee hole in the flask to examine the temperatures outside and test if what they say is true? Considering how hot the temperatures they say it is if they are indeed factual. These questions must then be allowed to enter in and be confronted with seriousness.
How is it then when one starts considering, influences the other to consider as well? She's got it sealed tight, unready to peek out. Perhaps a proposition to its reality would break her silence?
Today this thermos is now broken, consumed in flames with questions of "its" probability. The point is now to puncture a hole in her barrage and perhaps, only perhaps, she may shatter her defences as well.
Dear readers, I'm not talking about thermodynamics... Its a change in the point of view that must take place if there were to be a conclusion to questions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Hmm..I think I know what you are talking about.
When's the next coffee meet? :)
Thanks Daigajie ... I have no clue who u are lehh.. drop me an sms and we'll talk, haha~!
A thermos, if its thick thermal barrage, its last defence is shattered, then it would be a useless thermos then? A defenceless and useless thermos, how could it withstand another "attack" if there is any? Do u agree?
Dear.., the point of its shattering is so the thermos ceases to exist thus allowing itself to be consumed in all that there is around it.
A heavily fortified wall is useless when the drawbridge is let down. Still the guards on the walls determine who comes close.
Another "attack" namemly susceptibility to more questionings?
Because, about what I've written, the metaphorical understanding of the "resistance concept" is to illustrate the imperviousness to questionings. If only the other would allow herself to be consumed in questions.
Its not the matter of letting her guard down. She may still very well be heavily guarded.
Too chim! I don't un!
So what happened to the two thermos?
Mei Mei,
(Haha, that's what Granny used to call u in front of me...)
Two thermos has partially broken, now allowing questions to begin to make a difference.
Don't worry, koko has begun to look at the simpler things in life..
Post a Comment